Common Mistake in Contract Law
نویسنده
چکیده
English Contract Law has long struggled to understand the effect of a fundamental common mistake in contract formation. Bell v. Lever Brothers Ltd. [1932] A.C. 161 recognises that a common mistake which totally undermines a contract renders it void. Solle v. Butcher [1950] 1 K.B. 671 recognises a doctrine of ‘mistake in equity’ under which a serious common mistake in contract formation falling short of totally undermining the contract could give an adversely affected party the right to rescind the contract. This article accepts that the enormous difficulty in differentiating these two kinds of mistake justifies the insistence by the Court of Appeal in The Great Peace [2003] Q.B. 679 that there can be only one doctrine of common mistake. However, the article proceeds to argue that where the risk of the commonly mistaken matter is not allocated by the contract itself a better doctrine would be that the contract is voidable.
منابع مشابه
Unilateral Mistake in the English Courts: Reasserting the Traditional Approach
In the case of Statoil A.S.A. v. Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P., Aikens J. has reasserted the traditional principles of English law governing unilateral mistake. On one level, it is an unexceptional decision. It applies the well-settled law relating to unilateral mistake, based on long-established authority and as a reflection of the approach taken recently by the Court of Appeal to the sig...
متن کاملماهیت و مبانی نظریه نقض قابل پیش بینی در فقه و حقوق ایران
In the law of contract, one of the effects of contract breach by one party is right of another party in resorting to sanctions (remedies) resulting from the contract breach. But when this right is applicable that, on principle, the due date for performance of contract has been arrived and the promisor dose not performed his contractual obligations. But, occasionally, prior to the due date for p...
متن کاملThe Law and Economics of Contract Interpretation
Contract interpretation is an understudied topic in the economic analysis of contract law. This paper combines simple formal analysis of the tradeoffs involved in interpretation with applications to the principal doctrines of contract interpretation, including the “four corners” rule, mutual mistake, contra proferentum, and what I call the (informal but very important) rule of “extrinsic nonevi...
متن کاملتعهدات ناشی از قرارداد درمان با تأکید بر طرح چارچوب مشترک مرجع (DCFR)
A treatment contract involves joint obligations for the contracting parties which are normally a patient, a physician or a health center. A precise and detailed determination of the scope of these obligations plays a crucial part in the performance of the contract and specially in securing patients’ rights. This is what the Iranian legislator has failed to address or better to say that on...
متن کاملThe nature of public-private partnership
To explaining the public-private partnership matter, we have to search about the answer of this questions: public-private partnership Is subject of what kind of legal contracts? private law? Administrate law? And what kind of Outstanding feature make it difference from other contracts.in order to finding the answer we Explained the concept of partnership, the definition of governmental contract...
متن کامل